Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv10554
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as NJ/3:15-cv-03988
Plaintiff: RUTHANN SMITH and DARYL SMITH
Defendant: ETHICON, INC. , ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv12491
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01386
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv12083
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States v. London We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-6079
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DARRICK JERMAINE LONDON, AKA Darnell Wilson, AKA Derick Winston, AKA D-Loaded, AKA Marc Robinson, AKA Daryl Smith, AKA James Roberts, AKA James Robinson, AKA Darrell Johnson, AKA James Wilson, AKA Darrell Kinchen, AKA James Acklin
United States v. Smith
as 1:2013mc91037
Defendant: Daryle Smith
Plaintiff: United States of America
In Re: Midland Credit Management, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation
as 3:2011md02286
Plaintiff: Alexandra Zenoniani, Heather Moynihan, Cynthia Colacchia and others
Defendant: Unidentified Collector, Midland Funding LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Special Master: Honorable Herbert B. Hoffman
Petitioner: Eunice Brooks and Vladimir Francois
Intervenor Plaintiff: SEAN HARTRANFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Daryl Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3828
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DARYL SMITH
In re: Daryl Smith
as 10-5255
Petitioner: In re: DARYL SMITH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?