Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MIRARCHI v. BOOCKVAR et al
as 5:2021cv00126
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, CENTRE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ERCOLE A. MIRARCHI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SPRINGER v. KILHEFNER et al
as 5:2019cv00552
Defendant:
KLOVER METRO DC, INC., KLOVER PREFABRICATION PA, INC., GERALD KILHEFNER and others
Plaintiff:
MARK SPRINGER
DIGITAL MEDIA SOLUTIONS, LLC et al v. SOUTH UNIVERSITY OF OHIO, LLC et al
as 2:2019mc00009
Defendant:
SOUTH UNIVERSITY OF OHIO, LLC, DCEH EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC, ARGOSY EDUCATION GROUP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DIGITAL MEDIA SOLUTIONS, LLC
Undetermined:
MARK E. DOTTORE
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. SMITH et al
as 2:2015cv04760
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID C. SMITH, CHERYL V. PAJIL and DCS NIGHTLIFE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
BYRD et al v. AARON'S, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL BYRD and BRIAN BYRD
Defendant:
AARON'S, INC., ASPEN WAY ENTERPRISES, INC. doing business as AARON'S SALES AND LEASING, A FRANCHISEE OF AARON'S INC., DESIGNERWARE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FERNANDO DC
as 5:2011cv02272
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTONIO C. FERNANDO DC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
DC&H MECHANICS, INC. v. TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv01082
Plaintiff:
DC&H MECHANICS, INC. and DC&H MECHANICS, INC.
Defendant:
TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY, TECUMSEH COMPRESSOR COMPANY, TECUMSEH DO BRASIL, LTDA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
