Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 377
IN RE EX PARTE APPLICATION OF NORDEX ENERGY SE & CO. KG FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS.
as 2:2024mc00018
Plaintiff: IN RE EX PARTE APPLICATION OF NORDEX ENERGY SE & CO. KG FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS
Petitioner: NORDEX ENERGY SE & CO. KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In re Ex Parte Application of Gregory Gliner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024mc80087
Plaintiff: In re Ex Parte Application of Gregory Gliner and For an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings
Scarborough v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff: Davant Scarborough
Defendant: AT&T Inc., John Stankey and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
Collinsville Police Pension Board on behalf of the Collinsville Police Pension Fund v. Discovery, Inc.
as 24-646
Plaintiff: OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OHIO, COLLINSVILLE POLICE PENSION BOARD ON BEHALF OF THE COLLINSVILLE POLICE PENSION FUND, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant: DISCOVERY, INC., WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY, INC., DAVID ZASLAV and others
FuboTV Inc. et al v. The Walt Disney Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01363
Plaintiff: FuboTV Inc. and FuboTV Media Inc.
Defendant: The Walt Disney Company, ESPN, Inc., ESPN Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Orthogen International GmbH v. Edward Capla, et al
as 24-10411
Plaintiff: ORTHOGEN INTERNATIONAL GMBH, for an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 to conduct discovery for use in a foreign proceeding
Defendant: EDWARD CAPLA and YOLANDA CAPLA
Not Yet Classified: SERVICE
Intervenor: DOUGLAS SCHOTTENSTEIN and SCHOTTENSTEIN PAIN AND NEURO, PLLC D/B/A NY SPINE
In Re Ex Parte Application of C5 Capital Limited and Andre' Pienaar for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings
as 8:2024mc00045
Not Yet Classified: Ex Parte Application of C5 Capital Limited and Andre' Pienaar for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings
Intervenor: RosettiStarr, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
IN RE: ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 GRANTING LEAVE TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024mc00010
Not Yet Classified: ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 GRANTING LEAVE TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS
Petitioner: C5 CAPITAL LIMITED and ANDRE' PIENAAR
Respondent: Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLP and STEIN MITHCELL BEATO & MISSNER LLP
Twin Metals Minnesota LLC, et al v. USA, et al
as 23-5254
Plaintiff / Appellant: Twin Metals Minnesota LLC and Franconia Minerals (US) LLC
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America, United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, In her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Center for Biological Diversity, Ely Outfitting Company & Boundary Waters Guide Service, Freeman's Explore, LLC and others
In re Application of Mala Technologies Ltd. for Discovery in Aid of Foreign Litigation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
as 5:2023mc80266
Plaintiff: In re Application of MALA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. for Discovery in Aid of Foreign Litigation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 and Mala Technologies
In Re: Cisco Systems, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?