Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Cattanach v. Maricopa County Community College District, et al.
as 24-72
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNA LYNN CATTANACH
Defendant / Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, (MCCCD), DERIC HALL, named as Dr. Deric Hall, Director EEO, MELINDA CARABALLO, Acting Director EEO and others
Brody v. Walsh et al
as 3:2023cv01247
Plaintiff:
Donna Lynn Brody
Defendant:
Patricia Bayer Walsh, Morgan Stanley, Annabelle Palmieri and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00942
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Seiler v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:18-cv-00498
Plaintiff:
Donna Lynn Seiler
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dysart et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as MOE/4:16-cv-01585
Plaintiff:
Patricia J. Dysart , Kay Lorraine Johnston , Concetta Bonfiglio and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Patricia Dysart, et al
as 15-8020
Respondent:
Patricia Dysart, Kay Lorraine Johnston, Concetta Bonfiglio and others
Petitioner:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, formerly known as Luzenac America, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
