Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Terrell DysartIn re: Terrell Dysart
as 22-2125
Petitioner:
In re: TERRELL DEWAYNE DYSART
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ames v. Radzimski et al
as 2:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Randall S Ames
Defendant:
Judge Lech J Radzimski, Wesley Bruce Ames, Stanley Roy Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larissa Waln, et al v. Dysart School District, et al
as 21-15737
Defendant / Appellee:
DAWN DENSMORE, Board Member, STEVEN PIERCE, Valley Vista High School Assistant Principal, ROBERTA LOCKHART, Valley Vista High School Principal and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN WALN and LARISSA WALN
Reising et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as MOE/4:18-cv-00380
Plaintiff:
Amanda Reising , Ivette Babuca , Gloria Barotta and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
United States of America v. Dysart et al
as 2:2017mc00141
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kellie R Dysart
Garnishee:
Puyallup School District
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Dysart et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as MOE/4:16-cv-01585
Plaintiff:
Patricia J. Dysart , Kay Lorraine Johnston , Concetta Bonfiglio and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Patricia Dysart, et al
as 15-8020
Respondent:
Patricia Dysart, Kay Lorraine Johnston, Concetta Bonfiglio and others
Petitioner:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, formerly known as Luzenac America, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
