Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Kanealii v. Saito, et al.
as 24-3890
Plaintiff:
NOA KANEALII, IO PONO I KELII UA MAU
Defendant:
TYLER C. SAITO, MICHAEL SOONG, STATE OF HAWAII and others
Lopez Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3799
Petitioner:
INGRID Y LOPEZ RAMIREZ, I, DANIEL E LOPEZ RAMIREZ, I and ANGEL D TELLEZ LOPEZ, I
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Odquina v. City and County of Honolulu, et al.
as 24-3105
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ODQUINA
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU and ANNE E. LOPEZ, in her Official Capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
National Shooting Sports Foundation v. Lopez
as 1:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
National Shooting Sports Foundation
Defendant:
Anne E. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rush Spinks, Jr. v. E. Lopez, et al
as 21-15007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSH SPINKS, Jr.
Defendant:
T. LAU and C. SCHUTT
Defendant / Appellee:
E. LOPEZ
Lopez-Negron v. US
as 20-1502
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANCISCO E. LOPEZ-NEGRON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Santos Lopez Perez v. William Barr
as 20-1532
Petitioner:
SANTOS E. LOPEZ PEREZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Santos Lopez Perez v. Attorney General United States
as 20-1854
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
SANTOS E. LOPEZ PEREZ
Lopez-Barillas v. Barr
as 20-1047
Petitioner:
ROBERTO E. LOPEZ-BARILLAS
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Cesar Luna-Flores, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 19-56020
Respondent / Appellee:
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of DHS, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
E. G. LUNA-BRAVO, a minor, by and through her mother and Next Friend, Melva Eliu Bravo-Morales, C. LOPEZ-LUNA, minors, by and through their mother and Next Friend Rosario Luna-Flores, ALICIA LUNA-FLORES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
