Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Ennis v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Sandre Ennis
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., Crown FDO L.L.C., Asbury Automotive North Carolina Dealership Holdings L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 24-106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, "OBSERVER", "Q" and others
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 23-3569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, LINDSEY, SHIFT COMMAND and others
Pena-Torres, et al v. University of Science, Arts and Tech, et al
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUJEIL PENA-TORRES, JOSE E. BLASCO-JUSINO, LUCERO RODRIGUEZ-FERNANDEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE, Arts and Tech, a/k/a USAT, a/k/a Medical College of London, a/k/a Malina Medical College, a/k/a Metropolitan Innovative Group, Inc., a/k/a USAT Montserrat LLC, ORIEN L. TULP, CARLA M. KONYK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA et al v. Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Workers' Compensation
as 1:2023cv01968
Petitioner:
USA and Gail S. Ennis
Respondent:
Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Workers' Compensation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
USA v. Ennis
as 23-30397
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Davis Ennis
In re: David Paddison
as 23-30372
Petitioner:
In re: David R. Paddison
Respondent:
Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley, L.L.P.
State of Texas v. EPA
as 23-60300
Petitioner:
State of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
