Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Boothbay Absolute Return Strategies LP et al v. Belgische Scheepvaartmaatschappij-Compagnie Maritime Belge SA
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Boothbay Absolute Return Strategies LP, Boothbay Diversified Alpha Master Fund, LP, Corbin Hedged Equity Fund, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Belgische Scheepvaartmaatschappij-Compagnie Maritime Belge SA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
GoldenTree Master Fund, Ltd. et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al Future filings must be made in the CM/ECF system of the USBC-PR under Case No. 23-AP-0089 LTS.
as 3:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
GoldenTree Master Fund, Ltd., GTAM 110 Designated Activity Company, GoldenTree Distressed Master Fund III, LTD and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Governor Pedro Pierluisi, Executive Director Omar J. Marrero-Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc. and East Texas Air One
Consolidated Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv03231
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, RENOWN HEALTH and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, XAVIER BECERRA, U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Petitioner:
COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS, PHYSICIANS ADVOCACY INSTITUTE, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS and others
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERATION OF AMERICAN HOSPITALS, ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, AMERICA'S ESSENTIAL HOSPITALS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, California Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Leslie Hoffman v. SAG-Producers Pension Plan, et al
as 21-55936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESLIE HOFFMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SCREEN ACTORS GUILD-PRODUCERS PENSION PLAN, an ERISA Plan and SCREEN ACTORS GUILD-PRODUCERS HEALTH PLAN, an ERISA Plan
Susan Illis, et al v. CVS Health Corporation, et al
as 20-8009
Petitioner:
Adam Klein, Emil Jalonen, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Leah Weaver individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Susan Illis and others
Respondent:
Optum, Inc., CVS Health Corporation, Caremark, L.L.C. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: EpiPen ERISA Litigation
Betty Smith v. HPR Clinic, LLC, et al
as 20-3573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BETTY E. SMITH, in her capacity as attorney-in-fact for Dr. Paul C. Smith, individually and on behalf of the ERISA-covered plan
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR RYAN FRYMAN, DOCTOR HARRY NGUYEN and HPR CLINIC, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
