Cases 1 - 10 of 20
CAP Diagnostics, LLC v. Emeritus Medical Technology LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05242
Plaintiff:
CAP Diagnostics, LLC doing business as Pathnostics
Defendant:
Emeritus Medical Technology LLC doing business as EmeritusDX and Robert Embree
Relevent Sports, LLC v. United States Soccer Federatio
as 21-2088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Relevent Sports, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Soccer Federation, Inc. and Federation Internationale de Football Association
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, William W. Berry, III, Montague Professor of Law at the University of Mississippi School of Law., Aaron Edlin, Richard W. Jennings Professor of Law and Professor of Economics at the University of California, Berkeley. and others
Mahesh Khatri v. OSU, et al
as 21-3193
Defendant / Appellee:
CHANG-WON LEE, Professor Food Animal Health Research Program OARDC, The Ohio State University, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, ELAYNE M. SIEGFRIED, Human Resources Director College of Food, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAHESH KHATRI
Carolyn Callahan v. Brookdale Senior Living Commun, et al
as 20-55761
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES, 1 through 100, Inclusive, BKD TWENTY-ONE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Petitioner:
GENEFLOR SACRO, Proposed Intervenor and NINA REJUSO, Proposed Intervenor
Petitioner / Appellant:
MISHELLE NEVERSON, Proposed Intervenor
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAROLYN D. CALLAHAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Carolyn Callahan v. Brookdale Senior Living Commun, et al
as 20-55750
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES, 1 through 100, Inclusive, BKD TWENTY-ONE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Petitioner:
GENEFLOR SACRO, Proposed Intervenor and MISHELLE NEVERSON, Proposed Intervenor
Petitioner / Appellant:
NINA REJUSO, Proposed Intervenor
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAROLYN D. CALLAHAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Carolyn Callahan v. Brookdale Senior Living Commun, et al
as 20-55752
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES, 1 through 100, Inclusive, BKD TWENTY-ONE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Petitioner:
GENEFLOR SACRO, Proposed Intervenor and MISHELLE NEVERSON, Proposed Intervenor
Petitioner / Appellant:
NINA REJUSO, Proposed Intervenor
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAROLYN D. CALLAHAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Carolyn Callahan v. Brookdale Senior Living Commun, et al
as 20-55657
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES, 1 through 100, Inclusive, BKD TWENTY-ONE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
GENEFLOR SACRO, Proposed Intervenor
Petitioner:
MISHELLE NEVERSON, Proposed Intervenor
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAROLYN D. CALLAHAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Carolyn Callahan v. Brookdale Senior Living Commun, et al
as 20-55603
Defendant / Appellee:
BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES, 1 through 100, Inclusive, BKD TWENTY-ONE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MISHELLE NEVERSON, Proposed Intervenor
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAROLYN D. CALLAHAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Fister v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology et al
as 1:2020cv10789
Plaintiff:
David James Fister
Defendant:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology and EMERITUS Institute of Management Pte. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
James Swartz, et al v. Mark DiCarlo
as 19-4190
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TONIMARIE SWARTZ, VILMA SWARTZ and JAMES R. SWARTZ, JR.
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK A. DICARLO
Defendant / Appellee:
EMERITUS SENIOR LIVING, dba Emeritus At Willoughby, OH, AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION, dba Aultman Hospital and STEPHEN KOMARJANSKI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
