Cases 1 - 10 of 79
WIRTZ et al v. ERICSSON INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
SAUNDRA WIRTZ, DAVID WIRTZ, FRANCES WIRTZ and others
Defendant:
ERICSSON INC., ERICSSON AB, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
Ericsson, Inc. v. Koninklijke KPN N.V.
as 24-1240
Appellant:
ERICSSON, INC.
Appellee:
KONINKLIJKE KPN N.V.
Koninklijke KPN N.V. v. Ericsson, Inc.
as 23-2217
Appellant:
KONINKLIJKE KPN N.V.
Appellee:
ERICSSON, INC.
Ericsson, Inc. v. Koninklijke KPN N.V.
as 23-2175
Appellant:
ERICSSON, INC.
Appellee:
KONINKLIJKE KPN N.V.
GBS Linens, Inc. et al v. Beckman Instruments, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
GBS Linens, Inc. and TMF Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Beckman Instruments, Inc., Smithkline California Corporation, Smithkline Coporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Craigville Telephone Co. et al v. Ericsson, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01595
Petitioner:
Craigville Telephone Co. doing business as AdamWells and Consolidated Telephone Company doing business as CTC
Respondent:
Ericsson Inc
Thales DIS AIS Deutschland GmbH v. Ericsson, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00761
Petitioner:
Thales DIS AIS Deutschland GmbH
Respondent:
Ericsson, Inc.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al v. ERICSSON AB et al
as 1:2021mc00047
Respondent:
ERICSSON AB, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and ERICSSON INC.
Petitioner:
SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Ericsson Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 21-1565
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ERICSSON INC. and TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
CHRISTA LASER, PETER K. YU, ANN BARTOW and others
Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
as 21-1478
Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ERICSSON INC.
Appellant:
UNILOC 2017 LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
