Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,501
McCarthy v. Kaplan
as 24-1563
Plaintiff: ANA MCCARTHY
Defendant: DAVID KAPLAN, GABRIEL CLAGUE, SAMANTHA CLAGUE and others
Gabriel v. FCA US, LLC
as 3:2024cv00468
Plaintiff: Angelique Lashonda Gabriel
Defendant: FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Esona-Mamani, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3609
Petitioner: JUAN CARLOS CARLOS ESONA-MAMANI, I, SENNEN DEHIARINE ARROSPIDE MONTALVO, I and ADRIANO GABRIEL ESONSA ARROSPIDE, I
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kotsis v. Department of Transportation
as 24-1920
Petitioner: GABRIEL KOTSIS
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
United States v. Gabriel Cerda-Guillen
as 24-2163
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Gabriel Cerda-Guillen, also known as Gaby
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Center for Medical Progress, et al.
as 24-3526
Defendant: DAVID DALEIDEN, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff: PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Merritt
as 24-3532
Defendant: SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT and Susan Tennenbaum
Plaintiff: PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., et al. v. Newman, et al.
as 24-3536
Plaintiff: PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD: SHASTA-DIABLO, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. and others
Defendant: TROY NEWMAN and ALBIN RHOMBERG
Oppenheim v. Goldberg
as 24-1507
Plaintiff: GABRIEL R. OPPENHEIM, an individual
Defendant: SAMUEL R. GOLDBERG, an individual
USA v. Nava
as 24-10488
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Gabriel Nava

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?