Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Garity v. Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00956
Defendant:
Nancy J. Wysenski, Garen Bohlin, Larry Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Garity
Garity v. Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00827
Defendant:
Melinta Therapeutics, Inc., Nancy J. Wysenski, Garen Bohlin and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Garity
Garity v. Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00542
Defendant:
Nancy J. Wysenski, Garen Bohlin, Jeffrey A. Chodakewitz and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Garity
Rosemary Garity v. Megan Brennan
as 20-15588
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, U.S Postmaster General
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSEMARY GARITY
Garity v. Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11282
Petitioner:
Peng Zhao and Tian Tian
Defendant:
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Laila Thompson and Edward Garity
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Garity v. Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06797
Defendant:
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., BMO Capital Markets Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Garity
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Rosemary Garity v. USDC-NVL
as 17-72805
:
In re: ROSEMARY GARITY
Petitioner:
ROSEMARY GARITY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
PATRICK DONAHOE, USPS PMG and MEGAN J. BRENNAN, USPS PMG
Rosemary Garity v. APWU National
as 2:2012mc00461
Defendant:
APWU National
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Garity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
