Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Salaiz v. DEBT USA LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Erik Salaiz
Defendant:
DEBT USA LLC, CORDOBA LEGAL GROUP LLC, KISCH LAW FIRM PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gonzalez v. Kisch Law Firm, PLLC et al
as 3:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Yazmin Gonzalez
Defendant:
Kisch Law Firm, PLLC, Cordoba Legal Group, LLC and Debt Pay Gateway Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Callier v. Processing.Direct, LLC. et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Brandon Callier
Defendant:
Processing.Direct, LLC., Bryan Reed, Debt Pay, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
N.A. Sales Company, Inc. v. Bishop Ranch Gateway, Inc.
as 3:2019cv05226
Defendant:
Bishop Ranch Gateway, Inc.
Plaintiff:
N.A. Sales Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
N.A. Sales Company, Inc. v. Seo
as 3:2019cv00832
Defendant:
Mohammad Siddique, Davis Berk Realty, Inc., Mary Seo and others
Plaintiff:
N.A. Sales Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cunningham v. AAA Law Group, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00105
Defendant:
Philip Stevens, Matthew Mullen, Edgar Benes and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01199
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Equustek Solutions Inc. et al v. Jack et al
as 1:2018mi00020
Plaintiff:
Equustek Solutions Inc. , Robert Angus and Clarma Enterprises Ltd.
Defendant:
Morgan Jack, Andrew Crawford, Datalink Technology Gateways Inc. and others
NS Int'l Textiles v. YNJ Fashion Gateway, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00746
Defendant:
Does, Seok Eun Kang, Hai Jin Lee and others
Plaintiff:
NS Int'l Textiles
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
