Cases 1 - 10 of 51
United States v. Derrick Haggard
as 24-1443
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Derrick T. Haggard
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Darryl Scott v. Paul Penzone, et al
as 21-15854
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL PENZONE, Sheriff at Towers, County Jail, PHILLIP GRANT, Director of CHS Medical at Towers Jail, Maricopa, HAGGERTY, Commander/ Chief Jailer at Watkins, Maricopa County Jail and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL LEONARD SCOTT
USA v. Lawande Haggard
as 21-5254
Defendant / Appellant:
LAWANDE C. HAGGARD
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Haggard v. Discover Bank
as 3:2021cv00021
Plaintiff:
Patrick Haggard
Defendant:
Discover Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Timothy King, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 20-2205
Defendant / Appellee:
GRETCHEN WHITMER, JOCELYN BENSON and MICHIGAN BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES RITCHARD, JAMES HOOPER, MARIAN SHERIDAN and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
King et al v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2020cv13134
Plaintiff:
Daren Rubingh, Charles Ritchard, Timothy King and others
Defendant:
Michigan Board of State Canvassers, Jocelyn Benson, Gretchen Whitmer and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Democratic National Committee, City of Detroit, Michigan Democratic Party and others
Amicus Curiae:
Michigan State Conference NAACP
Interested Party:
Scott Hagerstrom, Julia Haller, Brandon Johnson and others
Larry Pearson v. Kimberly William, et al
as 20-40650
Defendant / Appellee:
JJ Pitts, Kimberly William and Jerry Haggard
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Pearson
Michael Rufus v. Courts of the United States, et al
as 20-6033
Defendant / Appellee:
MITCH LONGINO, SAMUEL D. OZBURN, CLERK OF ATHES-CLARKE COUNTY, GA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
