Cases 1 - 10 of 22
United States v. Michael Holst
as 23-3217
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Raymond Holst
Hessler v. ADAPTHEALTH CORP. F/K/A DFB HEALTHCARE ACQUISITIONS CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv05335
Plaintiff:
Carol Hessler
Defendant:
LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS, GREGG HOLST and others
Nominal Defendant:
ADAPTHEALTH CORP. F/K/A DFB HEALTHCARE ACQUISITIONS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FAILLE JR. v. ADAPTHEALTH CORP. F/K/A DFB HEALTHCARE ACQUISITIONS CORP. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2021cv03382
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES FAILLE JR.
Defendant:
ADAPTHEALTH CORP. F/K/A DFB HEALTHCARE ACQUISITIONS CORP., LUKE MCGEE, STEPHEN P. GRIGGS and others
John Bradin, et al v. Michael Carvajal, et al
as 21-5027
Respondent / Appellee:
Bureau of Prisons, Southern Center for Human Rights, Michael Carvajal, Director, Bureau of Prisons Central Office and others
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ross, Scott Howie, Gregory Greene and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
John Bradin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv03487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Wahidullah Medical Corp. v. St. Joseph Hospital of Eureka
as 3:2018cv02074
Defendant:
Alexey Shereshevsky, Stuart Cataldo, Humboldt Medical Specialists, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Wahidullah Medical Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Wahidullah Medical Corp. v. St. Joseph Hospital of Eureka
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2018cv02074
Plaintiff:
Wahidullah Medical Corp
Defendant:
St. Joseph Hospital of Eureka, Humboldt Medical Specialists, Inc, St. Joseph Health Northern California, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.