Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Yurok Tribe, et al v. Klamath Irrigation District, et al
as 23-15521
Plaintiff / Appellee: YUROK TRIBE, PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and others
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Counter Claimant: U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: KLAMATH TRIBES
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Cross Defendant: OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Yurok Tribe, et al v. Klamath Water Users Association, et al
as 23-15499
Plaintiff / Appellee: YUROK TRIBE, PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and others
Defendant / Appellee: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Counter Claimant: U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: KLAMATH TRIBES and KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Cross Defendant: OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 1:2021op45027
Plaintiff: The Hoopa Valley Tribe and Hoopa Valley Tribe
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as OHN/1:21-OP-45027
Plaintiff: Hoopa Valley Tribe
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Interested Party: Plaintiffs' Executive Committee for MDL 2804
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01814
Plaintiff: Hoopa Valley Tribe
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Petitioner: Non-Party Westlands Water District, Non-Party Panoche Water District and Non-Party San Luis Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Shasta View Irrigation Distric, et al v. United States Bureau of Reclam, et al
as 20-36020
Plaintiff / Appellant: TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, ROB UNRUH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST CONANT, Director of the Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation, in his official capacity, BRENDA BURMAN, Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation, in her official capacity, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE and THE KLAMATH TRIBES
Plaintiff: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Klamath Irrigation District, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-36009
Plaintiff: VAN BRIMMER DITCH COMPANY, SHASTA VIEW IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ROB UNRUH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST CONANT, Director of the Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, JEFFREY NETTLETON, in his official capacity as Area Manager for the Klamath Area Reclamation Office and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE and THE KLAMATH TRIBES
Plaintiff / Appellant: KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al
as 3:2020cv05630
Plaintiff: Hoopa Valley Tribe
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Not Classified By Court: Non-Party San Luis Water District, Non-Party Westlands Water District and Non-Party Panoche Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Matthew Mitchell v. Orico Bailey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-51123
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATTHEW MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee: HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE, doing business as Americorps Hoopa Tribal Civilian Community Corps and ORICO BAILEY
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46361
Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: Hoopa Valley Tribe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?