Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-2242
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Bennett, et al.
as 24-1351
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-1357
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-830
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70035
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Petitioner:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
United States of America v. Bennett
as 23-6126
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHEN J. BENNETT
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70016
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Petitioner:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
USA v. Bennett
as 23-60003
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Emmett Jason Bennett, also known as Emmett Jason Bennett, II, also known as Emmett Jason Bennett, Jr., also known as Emmett J. Bennett, also known as Emmett Bennett
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
John Baccus v. State of South Carolina
as 20-7565
Defendant / Appellee:
K. CONRAD, PRISON KEEPER BRIAN P. STIRLING, SUSAN DUFFY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BACCUS, a/k/a John Baccus Roosevelt
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
