Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Walker v. Schult
as 20-2415
Defendant:
Steven Wagner, Associate Warden, FCI Ray Brook, Anne Mary Carter, Associate Warden, FCI Ray Brook, J. L. Norwood, Regional Director and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jackii Sepanek, Counselor, FCI Ray Brook and Deborah G. Schult, Warden, FCI Ray Brook
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ellis Walker
American Federation of Government Employees Local 607 v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2011mc00067
Plaintiff:
American Federation of Government Employees Local 607
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and J. L. Norwood
Harry James Burdick et al v. J.L. Norwood et al
as 5:2009cv01977
Plaintiff:
Harry James Burdick
Defendant:
J L Norwood, P A Castillo, Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Terrance Antonio Baldwin v. J L Norwood et al
as 5:2009cv01590
Plaintiff:
Terrance Antonio Baldwin
Defendant:
J L Norwood, J L Norwood, Bourn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dameon Daley v. J.L. Norwood
as 2:2009cv05575
Petitioner:
Dameon Daley
Respondent:
J. L. Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Type:
Other Statutes
James W. Reddix v. United States
as 09-2182
Petitioner:
James Wesley Reddix
Respondent:
United States of America and J. L. Norwood, Warden
Chris Myers et al v. Audrey B. Collins et al
as 2:2009cv01723
Plaintiff:
Chris Myers, Dega Shelton, Ryon McClure and others
Defendant:
Audrey B. Collins, Jacqueline Chooljian, J. L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Jeremy Pinson v. J. Norwood, et al
as 09-55092
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMY V. PINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
J. L. NORWOOD, Warden, HARVEY G. LAPPIN and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Mark Alan Nyquist v. J L Norwood
as 8:2007cv01237
Respondent:
J L Norwood
Petitioner:
Mark Alan Nyquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
