Cases 1 - 10 of 40
In Re:Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1088
Petitioner:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Respondent:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC., PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and others
Interested Party:
BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION, and 36 other Higher Education Organizations, MICHAEL P. KEANE and others
Goldfarb v. Schroeder et al
as 1:2022cv04679
Plaintiff:
Akiva M. Goldfarb
Defendant:
Mark J.F. Schroeder and NYS Department of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Furman et al
as 1:2022cv04399
Plaintiff:
Sharona Furman, Igor Furman, Nichole Furman and others
Defendant:
Frontier Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Furman et al v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.
as 2:2022cv04399
Plaintiff:
Sharona Furman, Igor Furman, Nichole Furman and others
Defendant:
Frontier Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCI Communications Services, I, et al v. Skanska-Traylor-Shea, et al
as 21-80059
Respondent:
MCIMETRO ACCESS TRANSMISSION SERVICES and MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC.
Petitioner:
J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC., SKANSKA-TRAYLOR-SHEA, a joint venture, TRAYLOR BROS., INC. and others
Richard Iden v. Little, et al
as 21-15471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD IDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
LITTLE, Senior Correctional Officer, J.F., Correctional Officer and SHIFT LIEUTENANT
B.R. v. F.C.S.B.
as 21-1005
Defendant / Appellant:
T.B., J.F., J.O. and others
Defendant:
MIKE AND MARY ROES 1-15
Plaintiff / Appellee:
B.R.
Clark v. Schroeder
as 20-3887
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sean A. Clark
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark J.F. Schroeder, NYS Commissioner of DMV
Oliveros-Nikol v. Schroeder
as 1:2020cv04041
Defendant:
Mark J.F. Schroeder
Plaintiff:
Antonio Oliveros-Nikol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
