Cases 1 - 10 of 11
King et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00812
Plaintiff:
King, Erika King, Nona King and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Perry v. Gwinnett County Magistrate Court et al
as 1:2021cv04156
Plaintiff:
James Perry
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Magistrate Court and Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
James Perry v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-2801
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Perry
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
James Perry v. Richard Gottlieb
as 21-55513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES PERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD J. GOTTLIEB, in individual capacity; in representative capacity as trustee of the Richard J. Gottlieb Separate Property Trust dated July 30, 2018
USA v. James Perry
as 13-50344
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES PERRY
Vera Harper v. United Services Auto. Assoc.
as 11-1194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERA C. HARPER and DAVID A. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a USAA, STEPHEN HORVATH, DOES 1-50 and others
Vera Harper v. United Services Automobile
as 11-1193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERA C. HARPER, on her behalf and as personal representative of the Estate of Wilson Clark Harper, Deceased and DAVID A. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a USAA, STEVE LEE, J. LOUIS BLANCO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Naim Nafis Shakir
as 09-2665
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NAIM NAFIS SHAKIR, a/k/a Naim Shakir a/k/a James Perry
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
