Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Cunningham v. Fortney, et al.
as 24-1914
Plaintiff:
BRADLY M. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
ADAM FORTNEY, Snohomish County Sheriff, STAN WHITE, Chief of Police, Mill Creek, WA, MIKE REESE, Director of Corrections on behalf of State of Oregon and others
Cunningham v. US
as 24-1392
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OWEN M. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
CUNNINGHAM v. USA
as 1:2022cv01826
Plaintiff:
OWEN M. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Whitfield v. Whiting Petroleum Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv01437
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Whiting Petroleum Corp., Kevin S. McCarthy, Janet L. Carrig and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Whitfield v. Whiting Petroleum Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv03044
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Whiting Petroleum Corp., Kevin S McCarthy, Janet L Carrig and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Nasif v. Whiting Petroleum Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
William Nasif
Defendant:
Whiting Petroleum Corp., Kevin S. McCarthy, Janet L. Carrig and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Vangrinsven v. Whiting Petroleum Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01212
Plaintiff:
Mark Vangrinsven
Defendant:
Whiting Petroleum Corporation, Kevin S. McCarthy, Janet L. Carrig and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Knipp v. Whiting Petroleum Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01149
Plaintiff:
Kevin Knipp
Defendant:
Whiting Petroleum Corporation, Kevin S. McCarthy, Janet L. Carrig and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04998
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
