Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,966
Mogan v. State Bar of California, et al.
as 24-3492
Plaintiff: MICHAEL MOGAN, ATTORNEY
Defendant: STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, GEORGE CARDONA, in his official capacity as Chief Trial Counsel For the State Bar of California, and in his individual capacity, CHRISTOPHER JAGARD, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief Trial Counsel for the Office of the Chief Trial Counsel and in his individual capacity and others
Buzz PhotosIn re: Buzz Photos
as 24-10454
Petitioner: In re: Buzz Photos, Freedom Watch Incorporated and Larry E. Klayman, a Natural Person, members of the class and subclasses and all persons and entities similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00137
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cheairs v. City of Seattle, et al.
as 24-3163
Plaintiff: TAYLOR CHEAIRS
Defendant: CITY OF SEATTLE, and its officers, employees and agents, CITY OF SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, and its officers, employees and agents and JOHN DOES, 1-10, unidentified members of the Seattle Police Department
Muna al-Suyid v. Khalifa Hifter
as 24-1429
Plaintiff: MUNA AL-SUYID, individually and on behalf of the estates of her family members Abdel Salam al-Suyid, Ibrahim al-Suyid, Khalid al-Suyid and Mustafa al-Suyid, ABDALLA AL-KRSHINY, Individually and on behalf of his family member Ali al-Krshiny and Mustafa al-Krshiny, AHMAD AL-KRSHINY, Individually and on behalf of his family member Ali al-Krshiny and Mustafa al-Krshiny and others
Defendant: KHALIFA HIFTER, SADDAM HIFTER and KHALID HIFTER
Muna al-Suyid v. Khalifa Hifter
as 24-1422
Plaintiff: MUNA AL-SUYID, individually and on behalf of the estates of her family members Abdel Salam al-Suyid, Ibrahim al-Suyid, Khalid al-Suyid and Mustafa al-Suyid, ABDALLA AL-KRSHINY, Individually and on behalf of his family member Ali al-Krshiny and Mustafa al-Krshiny, AHMAD AL-KRSHINY, Individually and on behalf of his family member Ali al-Krshiny and Mustafa al-Krshiny and others
Defendant: KHALIFA HIFTER, KHALID HIFTER and SADDAM HIFTER
Eubanks v. Hansell
as 24-1165
Plaintiff: JAMAL EUBANKS, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Jace Eubanks, deceased and J. E., an infant, by his father and natural guardian, Jamal Eubanks
Defendant: DAVID HANSELL, former Commissioner, NEW YORK CITY ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, JOHN AND JANE ROES, said names being fictitious and intended to represent individual attorneys, caseworkers, investigators, youth development specialists, members, agents, servants and/or employees of the New York City Administration for Children's S and others
Space Exploration Tech v. NLRB
as 24-40315
Plaintiff: Space Exploration Technologies, Corporation
Defendant: National Labor Relations Board, a federal administrative agency, Jennifer Abruzzo, in her official capacity as the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, Lauren M. McFerran, in her official capacity as the Chairman of the National Labor Relations Board and others
Intervenor: Tom Moline, Deborah Lawrence, Scott Beck and others
Hendrix v. Martuscello
as 24-1129
Plaintiff: TROY HENDRIX
Defendant: ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, JOHN OR JANE DOES 6-10, members of the DOCCS SHMC as Marcy Correctional Facility, JAMES O'GORMAN, Deputy Commissioner for Correctional Facilities and others
San Luis Obispo County Homeless Union, et al. v. County of San Luis Obispo, et al.
as 24-2575
Plaintiff: SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY HOMELESS UNION, a local affiliate of the California Homeless Union, on behalf of itself, its members and current and former residents of Oklahoma Parking Site, DAVID RICHFORD, DAN RICHFORD and others
Defendant: COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES DIVISION, DEVIN DRAKE, in his official capacity as Director of Social Services and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?