Cases 1 - 10 of 21
ZELMA v. HALPERIN et al
as 2:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
RICHARD M. ZELMA
Defendant:
MICHAEL PETER HALPERIN, HFA HOLDINGS LLP, IP HORIZON INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Wilson et al v. Austin III et al
as 4:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Wilson, Members of the Armed Forces for Liberty, Michael Groothousen and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Scott Wells, Annmarie Acevedo, William Timothy Adams and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin III, Acting Commissioner Janet Woodcock, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pritish Vora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Peter et al v. Wojcicki et al
as 2:2021cv02026
Plaintiff:
Maria Peter, Michael Peter, Julika Berger and others
Defendant:
CEO online video pla Susan Diane Wojcicki, President BMGF William Henry Cates, CEO Mode-RNA Therape Stephane Bancel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Spitzauer v. USA
as 20-73451
Petitioner:
MICHAEL PETER SPITZAUER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael Spitzauer
as 20-35840
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL PETER SPITZAUER, AKA Michael Peter Scott Spitzauer McCune
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
24 Capital Funding, LLC v. Peters
as 19-3686
Plaintiff / Appellee:
24 Capital Funding, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Michael Peters
Defendant:
Peters Broadcasting Engineering, Inc.
PETERS v. TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES INC et al
as 4:2019cv00114
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. ISAAC, DR. SIDNEY E. HARRIS, PHILIP W. TOMLINSON and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PETERS
Peters v. Barr
as 19-1369
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Michael Fernando Peters, AKA Michael Peters
Violante v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAE/2:18-CV-01565
Plaintiff:
Violante and Michael Peter Violante
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Oroville Ford, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Oroville Ford Lincoln Mercury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
