Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Li v. Bristol
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Min Li
Defendant:
Alonzo Lonnie Bristol, III
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Bai et al v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP et al
as 2:2024at00303
Plaintiff:
Shi Bai, Jing Cai, Yikun Cai and others
Defendant:
CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP, CMB Export LLC, NK Immigration Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bai et al v. CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Shi Bai, Jing Cai, Yikun Cai and others
Defendant:
CMB Export Infrastructure Investment Group 48, LP, CMB Export LLC, NK Immigration Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Min Li v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 2:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
MS. MIN LI and Min Li
Defendant:
HON. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
VIRTU KCG HOLDINGS LLC et al v. LI
as 2:2017cv08296
Plaintiff:
VIRTU KCG HOLDINGS LLC and VIRTU AMERICAS LLC
Defendant:
MIN LI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Li et al v. Walsh, et al
as 9:2016cv81871
Plaintiff:
LAN LI , YING TAN , TAO XIONG and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH WALSH, JOSEPH WALSH, JR., J. MARCUS PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Li v. Holder
as 14-772
Petitioner:
Yong Min Li
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Li v. Holder
as 14-287
Petitioner:
Min Li
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Weili Li, L.Ac et al
as 1:2013cv02327
Defendant:
Amazing Acupuncture, PC, Boai Zhong Yi Acupuncture, PC, Dixu Gao, L.Ac and others
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Company,, Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company, and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Li v. Holder
as 11-4184
Petitioner:
Min Li
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
