Cases 1 - 10 of 71
United States of America v. Williams
as 24-736
Defendant:
DAJUAN WILLIAMS, JUWON ROBINSON, DASHAWN PULLEY and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jackson v. Quick, et al.
as 24-1740
Plaintiff:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant:
JASON QUICK, Watch Commander at Madera County Jail, ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, CSU Officer at Madera County Jail, LISETTE LOPEZ, Mailroom Officer at Madera County Jail and others
Gopalaswamy v. Baker et al
as 2:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Venky Gopalaswamy
Defendant:
Lynne Marley Baker and Advisors Equity LLC
United States of America v. Williams
as 22-2056
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juwon Robinson, AKA Lil' Cruz, Dashawan Pulley, AKA Spaz, Jaylinn Lenoir, AKA Cheeto, AKA Marley, AKA Beano and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Dajuan Williams, AKA D, AKA Detroit, AKA Corn, AKA Sosa
Eppes v. MMM Consumer Brands, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06341
Plaintiff:
Danielle Eppes
Defendant:
MMM Consumer Brands, Inc. doing business as Marley Spoon
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Anchorage SNF, LLC et al v. Padilla et al
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Anchorage SNF, LLC d/b/a Anchorage Healthcare Center, Bel Pre Leasing Co, LLC d/b/a Bel Pre Healthcare Center, BLUE POINT SNF, LLC d/b/a BLUE POINT HEALTHCARE CENTER and others
Petitioner:
MARLBORO LEASING CO, LLC d/b/a FORESTVILLE HEALTHCARE CENTER
Defendant:
Lourdes R. Padilla and Dennis R. Schrader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Mohamed Abdelkadir v. USPS, et al
as 21-35843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMED ABDELKADIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, C.J. MARLEY, Tort Claims Supervisor and TERRELL T. CARRINGTON
Abarr et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2021cv01203
Plaintiff:
Richard Caton, Juan Estrada, Anthony Hollingsworth and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
