Cases 1 - 10 of 293
Needleman v. McFadden
as 24-266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY S. NEEDLEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MCFADDEN, Detective NYPD, Special Investigation Unit, JOE CARSIO, Retired NYP Sergeant and SYLVIA ANDERSON, Gypsy Scammer
USA v. Tyron McFadden
as 24-1138
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TYRON MCFADDEN, a/k/a KEV, a/k/a RON, a/k/a TRO
Blackwell v. Jenkins, et al.
as 24-201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY KARL BLACKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
A. JENKINS
Defendant:
E. BARTKIEWIECZ, T. PRAKASH, IGOR DMYTRIENKO and others
Kevin Minehan v. Eric McDowell, et al
as 24-1040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN MINEHAN, Individually and derivatively on behalf of Christi Insurance Group, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC G. MCDOWELL, ANDREW T. LUNNEY and CHRISTI INSURANCE GROUP INC
Defendant:
MCFADDEN SCOTT INSURANCE LLC
Anthony WilliamsIn re: Anthony Williams
as 23-3037
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN KYLE RUSSELL, DEPUTY STEVEN MILLER, Warden of Treatment, DEPUTY ROBERT MCFADDEN and others
Mcfadden v. Insurance Supermarket Inc.
as 1:2023cv23957
Plaintiff:
Shamekia Mcfadden
Defendant:
Insurance Supermarket Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kevin Minehan v. Eric McDowell, et al
as 23-2737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN MINEHAN, Individually and derivatively on behalf of Christi Insurance Group, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC G. MCDOWELL, ANDREW T. LUNNEY, MCFADDEN SCOTT INSURANCE LLC and others
Mcfadden v. Empower Finance, Inc.
as 6:2023cv01914
Plaintiff:
Shamekia Mcfadden
Defendant:
Empower Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
McFadden v. Southwest Gas Corporation
as 4:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Michael McFadden
Defendant:
Southwest Gas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
