Cases 1 - 10 of 56
In re: Michael Miller
as 22-12839
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JEROME MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael Miller
as 21-30230
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. MILLER
Stein v. BMC Stock Holdings, Inc., et al
as 1:2020cv01364
Defendant:
David W. Bullock, James O. Leary, David L. Keltner and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Baker, et al v. Brown, et al
as 20-6132
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVAN D. ROSE, as next friend of Nelta Rose and as attorney-in-fact, PAUL BAKER, personal representative of the estate of Lois Isabelle Matti, deceased, SHAWN TREY MILLER, as next of friend of Idabelle Schnoebelen and as attorney-in-fact and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN CORBETT, Director of Oklahoma Health Care Authority, in his official capacity and JUSTIN BROWN, Director of Oklahoma Department of Human Services, in his official capacity
In re: Michael Miller
as 20-13078
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JEROME MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Terrance Ross v. Cleveland County NC
as 20-7114
Defendant / Appellee:
CLEVELAND COUNTY, MIKE MILLER, a/k/a Michael W. Miller, District Attorney for the City of Shelby and the County of Cleveland, sued in his individual capacity and CITY OF SHELBY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE JAVARR ROSS
Michael Miller v. Reliance Standard Life Ins Co.
as 20-30240
Defendant / Appellee:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL G. MILLER
Michael Miller v. Department of Corrections and, et al
as 20-55001
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, SIERRA CONSERVATION CENTER and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Michael Miller v. Hunter Anglea
as 19-73253
Respondent:
HUNTER ANGLEA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER
Miller v. UBS Financial Services Inc. et al
as 3:2019mc00084
Petitioner:
Michael E. Miller
Respondent:
UBS Financial Services Inc. and UBS Credit Corp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
