Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Fidelity Life Association v. Ntui et al
as 4:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Fidelity Life Association
Defendant:
Arrah Frida Ntui, Arrah Moise Oneke, A. T. M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Percy et al v. F & E Maintenance Inc et al
as NYE/1:21-CV-02194
Plaintiff:
Percy, Albert E. Percy, Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation and others
Defendant:
F & E Maintenance Inc, Grand Central Neighborhood, Hanac Inc and others
M. D. C., et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-5347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Y. O. T., D. P. R., G. G. L., a minor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
William Pelham Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, James McHenry, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, Andrew Davidson, in his official capacity as USCIS Asylum Office Division Chief and others
Quintez Talley v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 20-2093
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O LAIUVARA, LISA DURAND, UNKNOWN PRC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Dwayne Carter v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 19-2088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAYNE H. CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
INSPECTOR MASSICK, O. T. WINN, Warden, Saginaw Correctional Facility, CORRECTIONS OFFICER CANTU and others
Crump v. Best et al
as 2:2009cv14323
Plaintiff:
Horace Crump, Jr
Defendant:
Amy Best, James Zummer, O T Winn and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Wilson v. Rapelje et al
as 2:2009cv13030
Plaintiff:
Harold Lee Wilson, II
Defendant:
Lloyd Rapelje, Val Chaplin, O. T. Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Comer et al
as 5:2007cv00922
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Randy Comer, Michael Johnson and W O T 2 Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized Publication or Use of Communications
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
