Cases 1 - 10 of 37
CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY et al v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2023cv01633
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA and ALIANZA NACIONAL DE CAMPESINAS
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Center for Food Safety et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2023cv02714
Plaintiff:
Center for Food Safety and Pesticide Action Network North America
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Alianza Nacional de Campesinas, et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al
as 4:2022cv09030
Plaintiff:
Alianza Nacional de Campesinas,, Pesticide Action Network North America,, Rural Coalition and others
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Regan and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Center for Food Safety et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 4:2022cv06001
Plaintiff:
Center for Food Safety, Californians for Pesticide Reform, Center for Environmental Health and others
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Regan and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Center for Food Safety et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2021cv09640
Plaintiff:
Center for Food Safety and Pesticide Action Network North America
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CRLAF, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 21-71287
Petitioner:
CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION, FARMWORKER ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA, INC., THE MICHAEL J. FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSONS RESEARCH and others
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
National Family Farm Coalition et al v. Vilsack et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2021cv05695
Plaintiff:
National Family Farm Coalition, Center for Food Safety, Pesticide Action Network North America and others
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack, Kevin M. Shea, US Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
National Family Farm Coalition, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1043
Petitioner:
Center for Food Safety, Center for Biological Diversity, National Family Farm Coalition and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Jane Nishida, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator and Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator
Intervenor:
BASF Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Bayer CropScience LP
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2020cv00555
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler, Edward Messina and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Pesticide Action Network North America, Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Food Safety and others
Intervenor:
Bayer CropScience LP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
National Family Farm Coalition, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 20-73750
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, NATIONAL FAMILY FARM COALITION and others
Respondent:
ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator, and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.