Cases 1 - 10 of 113
UNITED STATES et al v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2024cv04771
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and others
Defendant:
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALDEN LEEDS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv07326
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALDEN LEEDS, INC., ALLIANCE CHEMICAL, INC., ARKEMA, INC. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Intervenor:
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION and PASSAIC VALLEY SEWERAGE COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. GIVAUDAN FRAGRANCES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv01699
Plaintiff:
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
GIVAUDAN FRAGRANCES CORPORATION, THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
Rogelio Castro v. Sierracin/Sylmar Corporation, et al
as 22-80146
Petitioner:
ROGELIO CASTRO, individually, and on behalf of members of the general public similarly situated
Respondent:
SIERRACIN/SYLMAR CORPORATION, a California corporation, SIERRACIN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation
United States of America v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Chemical Waste Management, Inc., Franklin International, Inc., International Paper Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant:
Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant:
Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant:
Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant:
Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
PPG Industries Inc v. Jiangsu Tie Mao Glass Co Ltd, et al
as 21-2288
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PPG INDUSTRIES INC, a Pennsylvania corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
JIANGSU TIE MAO GLASS CO LTD, a Chinese company, BENHUA WU, an individual and MEI ZHANG, an individual
Rogelio Castro v. PPG Industries, Inc., et al
as 21-55340
Defendant / Appellee:
SIERRACIN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation and SIERRACIN/SYLMAR CORPORATION, a California corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGELIO CASTRO, individually, and on behalf of members of the general public similarly situated
Trevor Mild v. PPG Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv04231
Defendant:
PPG Industries, Inc., Michael H. McGarry, Mark C. Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Trevor Mild
Petitioner:
Joe Cammarata
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
