Cases 1 - 10 of 254
Parry Labs, LLC v. Trigon Cyber, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01251
Defendant:
Trigon Cyber, Inc., Gary Carter, Jeff Ballard and others
Plaintiff:
Parry Labs, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Aigbohan
as 4:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Shamika Morgan, Revell Edward Hicks, Jr., Quinishia McDowell and others
Defendant:
Lifecare 2.1, LLC, Lifecare 2.0, LLC, Lifecare 2.0 Management Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rogers v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-4692
Defendant:
HARDER, Medical Assistant (MA) at SCCC, FREDRICK, Grievance Program Manager (GPM) at DOC, MAINIO, Captain (CPT) at SCCC and others
Plaintiff:
DARYL ROGERS
Swire Pacific Holdings Inc et al v. Rivas
as 2:2024cv00536
Defendant:
Gabriel Nathan Rivas
Plaintiff:
Parry Dee Ketchum and Swire Pacific Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Neuropublic S.A. - Information Technologies v. Ladas & Parry LLP
as 1:2024cv04156
Plaintiff:
Neuropublic S.A. - Information Technologies
Defendant:
Ladas & Parry LLP
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
United States of America v. Artis (Campbell)
as 24-922
Defendant:
MALIK CAMPBELL, SOLOMON ARTIS, LEONARD BARLETTO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MEDEROS PARRY et al v. TRANS UNION, LLC
as 2:2024cv01341
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ROBERT MEDEROS PARRY and BRANDON JOSEPH MEDEROS PARRY
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Harris (Edgar)
as 24-619
Defendant:
JAMAL HARRIS, KERRY PARRIS, CONRAD EDGAR and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
