Cases 1 - 10 of 34
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv02934
Not Classified By Court:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv02933
Defendant:
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
Claimant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Linda Epps v. Potomac Electric Power Co.
as 21-7032
Defendant / Appellee:
Potomac Electric Power Company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Linda D. Epps
Potomac Electric Power Compan v. WMATA
as 20-7104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Potomac Electric Power Company
Defendant / Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
BROWN v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
as 1:2017cv01131
Plaintiff:
GAMAL BROWN
Defendant:
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COTTMAN AVENUE PRP GROUP et al v. AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE INC.
as 2:2016cv06613
Plaintiff:
COTTMAN AVENUE PRP GROUP , BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY , CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. and others
Defendant:
AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9604
Yi v. Potomac Electric Power Company et al
as 8:2016cv01206
Plaintiff:
Chong Su Yi
Defendant:
Potomac Electric Power Company, Pepco Holdings Inc. and Exelon Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
as 1:2015cv01845
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
United States of America v. The Gillette Company et al
as 1:2012cv01247
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Gillette Company, KeySpan Gas East Corporation, Energizer Battery Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
John R. Stoebner v. Potomac Electric Power Company
as 11-6046
Debtor:
In re: LGI Energy Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John R. Stoebner, Trustee
Defendant - Appellee:
Potomac Electric Power Company, doing business as Pepco
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
