Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Clark v. Haynes International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
Haynes International, Inc., Robert H. Getz, Michael L. Shor and others
Coffman v. Haynes International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Haynes International, Inc., Robert H. Getz, Michael L. Shor and others
USA v. Malik Shelton
as 24-3012
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Malik R. Shelton
Brittany Hyre Anculle, et al v. USA
as 22-5494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY N. HYRE ANCULLE, JAMES H. BARNES, LISA M. BATES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ossie Giles v. Ron Davis, et al
as 21-15466
Defendant / Appellee:
J. KNIGHT, F. JAUGAN, C.O., J. SANGMASTER, Sgt. and others
Defendant:
M. NELSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OSSIE GILES
Damond v. State of LA
as 20-30684
Defendant / Appellee:
Michelle R. Shelton, City of Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Glenn Damond
Alexander Hamilton v. Ron Davis, et al
as 20-16495
Defendant / Appellee:
R. SHELTON, Lieutenant, RON DAVIS, Warden, J. BERMUDEZ, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER RASHAD HAMILTON
Michael Carter v. Ralph Shelton, et al
as 19-16565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
FITZSIMMONS, Officer and RALPH R. SHELTON
Anculle et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Kraujalis, Priscilla A. Blackburn, Malibu K. Messer and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Gregory J. Ellis v. Toys "R" US-Delaware, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv06645
Defendant:
Does and Toys "R" US-Delaware, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Ellis
Unknown:
Jonathan E Irwin, Richard Michael Hoffman, Katherine K. Ivers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
