Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Nathaniel Webb v. John Godfrey
as 21-7184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL R. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN GODFREY, MARSHALL PIKE, JANICE GRIMES and others
State of North Carolina v. Nathaniel Webb
as 18-6806
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant - Appellant:
NATHANIEL R. WEBB
Jiron, et al v. Davidson, et al
as 14-1004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE M. JIRON
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JANICE B. DAVIDSON, STEVEN BERNARD, LAURIE A. BOORAS and others
Jiron v. Davidson et al
as 1:2013mc00202
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Jiron
Defendant:
Janice B. Davidson, Steven Bernard, Laurie A Booras and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Webb et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-21217
Plaintiff:
Jennifer R. Webb and Eric Webb
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Webb et al
as 2:2012ms00041
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Donald R. Webb and Tami W. Webb
Mark Bailey, et al v. ERG Enterprises, LP, et al
as 11-11670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK F. BAILEY, GAY L. BAILEY, STEVEN R. BREDAHL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ERG ENTERPRISES, LP, LUBERT-ADLER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LP, LUBERT-ADLER REAL ESTATE FUND III, LP and others
Black v. Cincinnati Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00210
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Black
Defendant:
Cincinnati Financial Corporation , John J. Schiff, Jr. , Thomas R. Schiff and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bailey et al v. ERG Enterprises, LP et al
as 3:2010cv00422
Plaintiff:
Mark F. Bailey , Gay L. Bailey , Steven R. Bredahl and others
Defendant:
ERG Enterprises, LP, Lubert-Adler Management Company, LP, Lubert-Adler Real Estate Fund III, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
