Cases 1 - 10 of 100
United States of America v. Torres (Grullon)
as 26-3234
Defendant:
CARLOS REYNOSO, JASON ROMAN, ERIC MENDEZ and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Orellana Arriaza et al v. Blanche et al
as 2:2026cv01100
Defendant:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Department of Homeland Security, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Alan Martinez Ramos, Yiseth Yusbel Guevara Morales and Jose Alberto Orellana Arriaza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Elvys Ramos-Rico, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 26-14123
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
ELVYS CASTRO-CRUZ, ELIANYS CASTRO-RAMOS, TATIANA CASTRO-CRUZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02276
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09660
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09657
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02953
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jose Ramos v. Todd Blanche
as 26-2568
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General
Petitioner:
JOSE ANACLETO RAMOS
US v. Ramos-Rivera
as 26-2172
Interested Party:
U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee on behalf of PRP 2022-NMQ1 Trust
Defendant:
YAIRA RAMOS-RIVERA
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
