Other Statutes Cases
Nelson Dusenbery v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-20045
Defendant / Appellee: KEN PAXTON, Attorney General of Texas, JEFF SESSIONS, Former U.S. Attorney General, RALPH H. WALTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NELSON EDWARD DUSENBERY
Ambrose v. City of White Plains
as 16-2719
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joseph Ambrose, On behalf of themselves as Retired Employees of the City of White Plains, formerly in the Police Benevolent Association of White Plains, Inc., Raymond Aubel, On behalf of themselves as Retired Employees of the City of White Plains, formerly in the Police Benevolent Association of White Plains, Inc., Austin Avery, On behalf of themselves as Retired Employees of the City of White Plains formerly in the Police Benevolent Association of White Plains, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: City of White Plains, John Callahan, Individually and as Chief of Staff/ Corporation Counsel of the City of White Plains, County of Westchester, State of New York, Thomas M. Roach, In his official capacity as a member of the Common Council and others
Defendant: Adam T. Bradley, Individually and as Mayor of the City of White Plains, County of Westchester, State of New York, David Buchwald, In his official capacity as a member of the Common Council and Dennis J. Power, In his official capacity as a member of the Common Council
McPhail et al v. First Command Financial Planning Inc et al
as 4:2008mc00009
Plaintiff: Michael McPhail, Robert Barr Kimnach, III, Scott Wagner and others
Defendant: First Command Financial Planning Inc, First Command Financial Services Inc, Lamar C Smith and others
Barr v. New York State Higher Education Services Corporation
as 1:2007cv00436
Plaintiff: Robert Barr
Defendant: New York State Higher Education Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?