Cases 1 - 9 of 9
In re: Alton D. Brown, et al
as 16-2749
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
In re: Alton Brown, et al
as 15-1616
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
In re: Thomas Richard, Sr.
as 13-2384
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS PAUL RICHARD, SR.
Defendant - Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT C. MITCHELL
In re: Alton Brown, et al
as 10-4544
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, WILLIAM STICKMAN, LOUIS S. FOLINO and others
Kellett et al v. Cunningham Plumbing Co.
as 4:2010mc09029
Plaintiff:
Patrick Kellett , John O'Mara , Mark Collom and others
Defendant:
Cunningham Plumbing Co.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Hubert Jackson, et al
as 09-4553
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: HUBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM and TOM CORBETT
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT C MITCHELL
In re: Hubert Jackson, et al
as 09-4554
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: HUBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM and TOM CORBETT
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT C MITCHELL
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2009cv02107
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
