Other Statutes Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
OptumRX Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Pharmacy of Estes Park
as 8:2022cv00565
Petitioner: OptumRX Inc.
Respondent: Rocky Mountain Pharmacy of Estes Park
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
OptumRX Inc. v. A & S Drugs LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv00468
Petitioner: OptumRX Inc.
Respondent: A & S Drugs LLC and A and S Drugs LLC
Consolidated Defendant: Mytillini Enterprises, The Casey Group, Beatties Community Pharmacy Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
James Casula v. Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv01559
Defendant: James Casula, Rocky Mountain Holdings LLC d/b/a Rocky Mountain Helicopters, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Schmidt Lithograph Co. et al
as 2:2019mc00096
Defendant: United States Printing & Lithograph Company of California, Wallace Martin, W. E. Steege and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00056
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: David Daleiden and Center for Medical Progress & BioMax
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al
as 3:2019mc80042
Defendant: David Daleiden, Sandra Merritt, Biomax Procurement Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Center For Choice, Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Planned Parenthood Orange & San Bernardino Counties, Inc. and others
Respondent: StemExpress, LLC and Sarah Heuston
Receiver: Planned Parenthood: Shasta-Diablo, Inc. and Planned Parenthood: Shasta-Diablo, Inc. doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc et al v. Center for Medical Progress et al
as 2:2019mc00010
Defendant: Sandra Susan Merritt, Center for Medical Progress, Biomax Procurement Services, LLC and others
Respondent: DV Biologics and DaVinci Biosciences
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Planned Parenthood Rocky Mountains and others
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00009
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: Troy Newman, Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, Gerardo Lopez Lopez and others
Receiver: Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. Doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California
Respondent: StemExpress, LLC and Sarah Heuston
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax
as 2:2019at00042
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: Troy Newman, Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, Gerardo Lopez Lopez and others
Receiver: Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc. Doing business as Planned Parenthood Northern California
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc et al v. Center for Medical Progress et al
as 2:2019mc00007
Defendant: Center for Medical Progress, Biomax Procurement Services, LLC, Albin Rhomberg and others
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc, Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast and others
Respondent: Deborah Nucatola

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?