Cases 1 - 10 of 327
Sullivan v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2024cv02214
Plaintiff:
Scott B. Sullivan
Defendant:
Steve Sullivan, Herbert McCowen, Diana Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rutherford v. Central Bank of Kansas City
as 3:2024cv05299
Plaintiff:
Samuel C Rutherford, III
Defendant:
Central Bank of Kansas City
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfers Act
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Bruce RutherfordIn re: Bruce Rutherford
as 23-40632
Petitioner:
In re: Bruce Allen Rutherford, also known as Allen Bruce Rutherford
Miller, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 23-2979
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES MILLER, SAN DIEGO COUNTY GUN OWNERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, WENDY HAUFFEN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in their official capacity, ALLISON MENDOZA, In their official capacity, BRENT ORRICK, in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms and others
Christopher Pascoe v. Scarborough, et al
as 23-5910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER PASCOE
Defendant / Appellee:
J. J. SCARBOROUGH, Jailer, ERNIE RUTHERFORD, Chief Deputy, JANET KAUFMAN, Deputy Jailer and others
USA v. Kyle Rutherford
as 23-3704
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KYLE RUTHERFORD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Klair et al v. Long et al
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Patti Klair, Robert Myers, Robert Barnes and others
Defendant:
Kevin Long, Millcreek Commercial LLC, Colliers International and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
