Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Long v. Mercedes-Benz USA L L C
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff: Robert Long
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Mercedes-Benz U S A L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hargrave et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA L L C
as 6:2024cv00332
Plaintiff: Kevin Hargrave and Natalie Deshotels Hargrave
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Mercedes-Benz U S A L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
New Cingular Wireless P C S L L C v. City of Jennings, Louisiana et al
as 2:2023cv01769
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless P C S L L C doing business as A T & T Mobility
Defendant: City of Jennings and Phillip Arceneaux
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Medco Energi U S L L C v. Haaland et al
as 2:2023cv01755
Plaintiff: Medco Energi U S L L C
Defendant: Debra Haaland and Howard Cantor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Louisiana v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 6:2023cv00225
Plaintiff: State of Louisiana
Defendant: AbbVie Inc, Warner Chilcott Sales U S L L C, Warner Chilcott, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Sr. Kate Reid, et al v. Doe Run Resources Corporation, et al
as 23-8001
Respondent: Sr. Kate Reid, Megan Heeney, as next friends of, A. O. A. and others
Petitioner: The Doe Run Resources Corporation, a New York Corporation, D. R. Acquisition Corp., a Missouri Corporation, Albert Bruce Neil and others
New Cingular Wireless P C S L L C v. Jennings et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv06025
Plaintiff: New Cingular Wireless P C S L L C and New Cingular Wireless P C S L L C doing business as A T & T Mobility
Defendant: City of Jennings and Phillip Arceneaux
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0503 Violation of wire or radio comm regulations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00344
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
M.A. v. Rockland County Department of
as 21-551
Plaintiff / Appellant: T.T., on behalf of his minor child, M., L.V.G., on behalf of his four minor children, M.K., on behalf of his minor child, A. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Ed Day, sued in his individual capacity, sued in his individual capacity, County Executive, sued in his official capacity, County Executive, sued in his individual capacity, Dr. Patricia Schnabel Ruppert, Commissioner, sued in her officail capacity, sued in her individual capacity, Rockland County Department of Health and others
1st Quality Produce, Inc. et al v. Jarz, Inc.
as 2:2019cv07314
Plaintiff: Direct Produce, Inc., JHP Produce, Inc., Excell Prod, Inc. and others
Defendant: Jarz, Inc. and Jarz, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Lipkin Distribution doing business as S and L Distribution
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?