Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
USA v. Jamaal Hunt
as 22-1475
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMAAL S. HUNT
Peyton Hopson v. Deborah Hunt
as 21-3101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEYTON JOHN WESLEY HOPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBBIE S. HUNT and DEBORAH S. HUNT
BATES et al v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2018mc00086
Respondent:
ANNEKA P. COLLINS, JULIE A. HORNE, CLERK OF COURT and others
Petitioner:
MAURA M. ROLL, MISTY C. BRICKLES, R. LOTUS JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. Federal State and Local Corpora Ficta Employees et al
as 3:2017mc80061
Plaintiff:
Fareed Sepehry-Fard
Defendant:
Federal, State and Local Corpora Ficta Employee(s ), Lucy H. Koh, Edward J. Davila and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nguyen v. LVNV Funding, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00819
Plaintiff:
Tony Nguyen
Defendant:
LVNV Funding, LLC, Michael S. Hunt and Janalie A. Henriques
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nguyen v. LVNV Funding, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00758
Plaintiff:
Tony Nguyen
Defendant:
LVNV Funding, LLC , Michael S. Hunt and Janalie A. Henriques
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Curran v. Hunt et al
as 3:2015cv00674
Plaintiff:
James Curran
Defendant:
Michael S. Hunt and Janalie A. Henriques
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
