Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Abitbul v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 0:2023cv60559
Plaintiff: Aviel Abitbul
Defendant: Attorney General of the United States, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Levi v. Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security(DHS) et al
as 0:2021cv60379
Defendant: KENNETH CUCCINELLI, SECRETARY Alejandro MAYORKAS, Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and others
Plaintiff: Guy Levi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Sanchez Ramirez v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2020cv22545
Defendant: KENNETH CUCCINELLI II, male, Chad F. Wolf, Linda M. Swacina and others
Plaintiff: Juan Carlos Sanchez Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Statewide Bonding, Inc., et al v. DHS, et al
as 19-5364
Plaintiff / Appellant: Statewide Bonding, Inc., Mike Donovan, Nexus Services, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Kirstjen M. Nielsen, in her individual capacity, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), United States Department of Homeland Security, "DHS" and others
Statewide Bonding, Inc., et al v. DHS, et al
as 19-5342
Plaintiff / Appellant: Statewide Bonding, Inc., Mike Donovan, Nexus Services, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Chad F. Wolf, in his individual capacity as Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Matthew T. Albence, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Martinez v. Nielsen
as 19-2533
Not Yet Classified: Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Warden, Orange County Correctional Center, Ronald D. Vitiello, Deputy Director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Respondent: Secretary Kirstjen M. Nielsen, United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Secretary Kevin McAleenan, United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
In Re: Manuel Gonzalez-Reyes
as 19-1810
Respondent: William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Jeffrey Searls, Facility Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security "DHS"
Petitioner: Manuel Gonzalez-Reyes, AKA Manuel Nicolas Gonzalez-Reyes
Statewide Bonding, Inc., et al v. DHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5178
Plaintiff / Appellant: Statewide Bonding, Inc., Mike Donovan, Nexus Services, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE, Jody M. Prescott, in his official capacity as Associate Legal Advisor, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Ronald D. Vitiello, in his individual and official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and others
Godefroy Tcheufa v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1032
Petitioner - Appellant: GODEFROY YOUSSA TCHEUFA
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States of America, JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS),, JULIE MAYERS, Assistant Secretary, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and others
Morales-Vazquez v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2008cv21559
Plaintiff: Jose Morales-Vazquez
Defendant: Attorney General of the United States, District Director USCIS, Miami, Florida, Secretary of the Department Of Homeland Security (DHS) and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?