Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 291
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2024cv24758
Plaintiff: Catalina Dinovo, Darin Griffin, Iman Jones and others
Defendant: Highmark Inc doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as Healthnow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
USA v. William Sexton
as 24-3095
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WILLIAM R. SEXTON
USA v. William Sexton
as 24-3085
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WILLIAM R. SEXTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv05269
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kingi, et al. v. Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, et al.
as 24-5306
Plaintiff: BERTHA ALICIA BENAVIDES, ALEXIS CHRISTOPHER, BRENT SEXTON and others
Defendant: SCREEN ACTORS GUILD - AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS, a labor organization and Delaware Corporation and DOES, 1 through 20, inclusive
SEC v. Gasarch
as 24-1770
Defendant: ZHIYING YVONNE GASARCH, JACKSON T. FRIESEN, GRAHAM R. TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC v. Veldhuis
as 24-1771
Defendant: COURTNEY KELLN, MIKE K. VELDHUIS, PAUL SEXTON and others
Plaintiff: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC v. Sexton
as 24-1772
Defendant: WILLIAM T. KAITZ, AVTAR S. DHILLON, GRAHAM R. TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC v. Kelln
as 24-1773
Defendant: GRAHAM R. TAYLOR, AVTAR S. DHILLON, PAUL SEXTON and others
Plaintiff: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC v. Friesen
as 24-1774
Defendant: GRAHAM R. TAYLOR, ZHIYING YVONNE GASARCH, AVTAR S. DHILLON and others
Plaintiff: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?