Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Hill et al v. Warren Averett LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Mildred Susan Hill and Bryan Hirsch
Defendant:
Warren Averett LLC, Warren Averett Companies LLC, Mary Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Viswasam et al v. Pavlik et al
as 0:2023cv60023
Plaintiff:
Sharmila Viswasam, Luis A Sequeira, Jon Sisson and others
Defendant:
Joseph Pavlik, Toby McBride and Michael Holley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Sisson v. Barton et al
as 2:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Brian Sisson
Defendant:
Richard N Barton, Erik Blachford, Amy Bohutinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Susan Baker, et al v. Dean Meiling, et al
as 21-15957
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOAN DOTSON, an individual, LEONARD A. SEMAS, an individual, LARRY SMITH, an individual and others
Defendant:
JAMES PROCTOR, an individual, TIFFANY SCHWARTZ, an individual, JANET CHUBB, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DSM PARTNERS, LP, a Nevada Limited Partnership, DSM P GP LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, CHEMEON SURFACE TECHNOLOGY LLC, a Nevada limited Liability Company and others
Susan Baker, et al v. Dean Meiling, et al
as 20-17215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOAN DOTSON, an individual, LEONARD A. SEMAS, an individual, LARRY SMITH, an individual and others
Defendant:
JAMES PROCTOR, an individual, TIFFANY SCHWARTZ, an individual, JANET CHUBB, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DSM PARTNERS, LP, a Nevada Limited Partnership, DSM P GP LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, CHEMEON SURFACE TECHNOLOGY LLC, a Nevada limited Liability Company and others
USA v. Jarvis Sisson
as 20-5957
Defendant / Appellant:
JARVIS ROOSEVELT SISSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00275
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
