Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Argentum Risk Partners LLC v. Schaeffer
as 24-1090
Not Yet Classified:
ARGENTUM RISK PARTNERS LLC, BRAD SCHAEFFER and B.P. SCHAEFFER HOLDINGS LLC
Tyler SchaefferIn re: Tyler Schaeffer
as 23-5712
Petitioner:
In re: TYLER JAMES SCHAEFFER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BAPTISTE v. VOX MEDIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
AMBER BAPTISTE
Defendant:
VOX MEDIA, INC., SEQUOIA CAPITAL, MICHAEL LEWIS GOGUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gottlieb v. Schoenfelder et al
as 1:2023cv06047
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gottlieb
Defendant:
Luke Schoenfelder, Garth Mitchell, Barry Schaeffer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Latch, Inc. f/ka/ TS Innovation Acquisitions Corp. and Latch, Inc.
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 1:2023cv05881
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Schaeffer v. Signature Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01921
Plaintiff:
Matthew Schaeffer
Defendant:
Signature Bank, Joseph DePaolo, Stephen Wyremski and others
SCHAEFFER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00244
Petitioner:
KAROL SCHAEFFER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
In Re Latch Inc. Derivative Litigation
as 1:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
Eric Manley
Defendant:
Luke Schoenfelder, Garth Mitchell, Barry Schaeffer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Latch, Inc. f/ka/ TS Innovation Acquisitions Corp., Latch, Inc. and TS Innovation Acquisitions Corp.
Consolidated Defendant:
Daniel Gottlieb
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
