Cases 1 - 10 of 23
US v. Andrew Wilson
as 23-6960
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW SCOTT WILSON, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson
US v. Andrew Wilson
as 22-7422
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW SCOTT WILSON, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson
US v. Andrew Wilson
as 22-4344
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW SCOTT WILSON, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson
Scott Witzke v. Michael Bouchard
as 21-1410
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL J. BOUCHARD
Petitioner / Appellant:
SCOTT ANDREW WITZKE
Nicole Thompson v. Scott Renner, et al
as 21-1366
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT ANDREW RENNER and VELO ASSOCIATES, PLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NICOLE THOMPSON
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL. HILL v. ANDREWS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03176
Defendant:
SCOTT ANDREWS, STUART HUFFER, HUFFER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL. HILL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1
Calvin Norton v. Columbus Board of Elections
as 20-1333
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES E. PREVATTE, individually and in his official capacity as Columbus County Board of Commissioner, SCOTT ANDREW YATES, individually and in his official capacity as registered agent, president, and board of director of Red Dome Group, Inc., CHARLES MCDOWELL, individually and in his official capacity as Columbus County Board of Commissioner and others
Interested Party:
JEFF CARMON, DAVID BLACK, BOB CORDLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN TYRONE NORTON
Scott Witzke v. Russ Marlan, et al
as 20-1073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT ANDREW WITZKE
Defendant:
RUSS MARLAN, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
EBONY M. PULLINS-GOVANTES
Scott Witzke v. Russ Marlan, et al
as 19-1169
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTT ANDREW WITZKE
Defendant:
RUSS MARLAN, et al.
Defendant / Appellant:
EBONY M. PULLINS-GOVANTES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
