Cases 1 - 10 of 315
Frederick Banks v. Secretary of the Navy et al
as 2:2024cv03779
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Secretary of the Navy, Secretary of the Air Force, Secretary of the Marines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gardenia Dorado-Ocasio v. Christine Wormuth
as 24-1360
Plaintiff:
GARDENIA M. DORADO-OCASIO
Defendant:
CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Army
Michael Baxley v. Christine Wormuth, et al
as 24-5104
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Baxley
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth, Honorable, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Army and Army Board for Correction of Military Records
Andrew Dudt v. Christine Wormuth
as 24-5084
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dudt, Major, U.S. Army
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth, The Honorable, Secretary of the Army
Flatland Realty, LLC v. Secretary of the Army
as 24-1534
Appellant:
FLATLAND REALTY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Hamp' s Construction LLC v. Secretary of the Army
as 24-1528
Appellant:
HAMP' S CONSTRUCTION LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Flatland Realty, LLC v. Secretary of the Army
as 24-1531
Appellant:
FLATLAND REALTY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Delfasco LLC v. Secretary of the Army
as 24-1363
Appellant:
DELFASCO LLC
Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
DEITERING v. WORMUTH
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES DEITERING
Defendant:
CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE ARMY and CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Students for Fair Admissions v. United States Military Academy at West Point
as 24-40
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY AT WEST POINT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, LLOYD AUSTIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
