Cases 1 - 10 of 18
AuCopious, LLC et al v. SPG14, LLC et al
as 1:2022at00650
Plaintiff:
AuCopious, LLC, James E Davis and Roy A Walker
Defendant:
SPG14, LLC, Dean B Larimer, Barbara E. Robinson Trust and others
Griffin Burke, et al v. Trevor Basil, et al
as 21-55922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GRIFFIN BURKE
Plaintiff:
GREGORY M. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
TREVOR BASIL, NEWPORT-MESA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, SEAN BOULTON and others
USA v. Thomas Robinson
as 21-1580
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS ROBINSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Miranda Guy v. Bd of Ed, Rock Hill, OH Local, et al
as 21-3387
Defendant / Appellee:
MARSH MCLENNAN AGENCY, LLC, KEITH ROTH, Board of Education, Rock Hill, OH Local School District, TREASURER THOMAS ROBINSON, Rock Hill, OH Local School District and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIRANDA GUY
USA v. Thomas Robinson
as 20-1943
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS ROBINSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas Robinson, et al v. PA Department of Corrections, et al
as 20-2698
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL and SMART COMMUNICATION, sued in their Private and Official Capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS ROBINSON and WILLIAM HULL
Thomas Robinson v. Cole Lambert, et al
as 20-10739
Defendant / Appellee:
J. WASHBURN, in his individual capacity, A. PETERKIN, in his individual capacity and COLE LAMBERT, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS ROBINSON
USA v. Bryan Robinson
as 19-30503
Defendant / Appellant:
BRYAN THOMAS ROBINSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas Robinson, et al v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-2334
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL and SMART COMMUNICATION, Sued in their private & official capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS ROBINSON and WILLIAM HULL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
