Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Talbot County, Maryland v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
Talbot County, Maryland
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Roger Baker, Jr. v. John Johnson, Jr., et al
as 20-10167
Defendant / Appellee:
BOBBY G. PETERS, Judge Superior Court-Talbot County and JOHN WILLIAM JOHNSON, JR., Judge of Magistrate Court-Talbot County
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER LEE BAKER, JR.
Clayland Farm Enterprises, LLC v. Talbot County, Maryland
as 19-2102
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK FISCHER, in his individual and official capacity, THOMAS HUGHES, in his individual and official capacity, TALBOT COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLAYLAND FARM ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
Harford County, Maryland et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45853
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Harford County, Maryland, City of Frederick, Maryland, City of Bowie, Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Harford County, Maryland et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as MD/1:18-cv-01913
Plaintiff:
Harford County, Maryland , Caroline County, Maryland , Garrett County, Maryland and others
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P. , Cephalon, Inc. , Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Harford County, Maryland et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv01913
Plaintiff:
Harford County, Maryland , Caroline County, Maryland , Garrett County, Maryland and others
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Baker, Jr v. Harris County District Attorney et al
as 6:2018cv00010
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Baker, Jr
Respondent:
Harris County District Attorney, Talbot County Superior Court, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
