Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nancy Fiedler et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2023cv00985
Plaintiff: Nancy Fiedler, Matthew Guiney, Olga Faynshteyn and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, E. MARTIN ESTRADA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Singh v. Wilkinson
as 20-60541
Petitioner: VIKRAMJEET SINGH, also known as Vikram Singh
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General, Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting U.S. Attorney General and others
Vikram Singh v. William Barr
as 19-72774
Petitioner: VIKRAM SINGH
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Case name not on file
as 3:2018mc00160
In Re: Vikram Singh-Batthal
Proxysoft Worldwide, Inc. v. Flosscare Worldwide, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01262
Plaintiff: Proxysoft Worldwide, Inc.
Defendant: Flosscare Worldwide, Inc. , Island Brook LLC , Vikram Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Wright v. Weaver et al
as 1:2013rj00025
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Wright
Defendant: Judson T. Weaver, Bright Star Hospitality, Inc., Bright Star Lounge, The and others
Vikram Ghai v. U.S. Attorney General
as 13-10734
Petitioner: VIKRAM SINGH GHAI
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bikramjeet Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2424
Petitioner: BIKRAMJEET SINGH, also known as VIKRAM SINGH
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Singh v. Holder
as 10-5191
Petitioner: Vikram Jeet Singh, AKA Jeet Vikram Singh
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Singh v. Holder
as 10-4581
Petitioner: Vikram Singh, AKA Vikram Ghotra, AKA Vikram Singh Chotra
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?